harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Elena Semukhina" <elena.semukh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: towards a new implementation of java.math
Date Thu, 18 May 2006 05:05:46 GMT
On 5/17/06, Daniel Fridlender <dfridlender@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> After a discussion we had a few weeks ago in this forum on the
> different implementations of java.math donated to Harmony
> (Harmony-(39+380) and Harmony-199) we (ITC) decided to voluteer for
> the task of integrating them into a single implementation which would
> benefit from the best features of Harmony-39, 380 and 199.
> We will consider comparing on a method-by-method level but also on
> ideas level so that the new implementation will probably require
> re-programming good ideas from the existing implementations.  In the
> case of BigInteger we will also compare the benefits of the different
> internal representations.
> Right now we are analysing the two implementations.  Once we are done
> with this analysis we will make it public and propose a way to proceed
> towards an integration.
> BTW, we had problems patching Harmony-380 over Harmony-39, it attempts
> to erase non-existing lines.  Did we miss something?  Is there any
> other intermediate patch that we have missed?

you've missed Harmony-273 which inserts javadoc comments in the source code.


> Daniel Fridlender
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message