harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [Stress tests] generator review I
Date Tue, 23 May 2006 17:44:17 GMT
The JUnit license is compatible with what we are doing, so if there's 
something there we can re-use, great.

Also look at TestNG.  Someday when I find the time, I'm going to make 
the argument we should switch, and don't wish to be held back by JUnit :)

geir


Anton Luht wrote:
> Alexander,
> 
> I've looked at the existing JUnit extensions and some ot them look
> quite similar to your generator proposal at first glance.
> 
> The list of extentions is here:
> 
> http://www.junit.org/news/extension/index.htm
> 
> The most relevant seem to be: JUnitPerf  and JMTUnit . I'm not sure
> that their license fits Harmony (JUnitPerf has BSD one and the license
> of JMTUnit is not specified on the project page) but the functionality
> seems to be very close to the generator.
> 
> The main difference I see now is that your tool supports command-line
> parsing and those ones need creating additional JUnit tests that
> contain wrappes for existing ones.
> 
> Here is an example of JUnitPerf test that runs some JUnit test (Test1)
> in 2 threads 20 times in each thread (imports omitted):
> 
> public class JUnitPerfTest1 {
> 
>    public static void main(String[] args) {
>        Test testCase = new TestSuite(Test1.class);
>        Test loadTest = new LoadTest(testCase, 2, 20);
>        junit.textui.TestRunner.run(loadTest);
>    }
> }
> 
> 
> My question is: are there any strong reasons for creating yet another
> framework or we can reuse an existing one?
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message