harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Hindess <mark.hind...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [tools] tools launching and javac
Date Thu, 25 May 2006 21:08:26 GMT

On 25 May 2006 at 13:30, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> Mark Hindess wrote:
> > On 25 May 2006 at 7:46, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> >> Tim Ellison wrote:
> >>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> >>>> Tim Ellison wrote:
> >>>>> This is still work in progress, but thought it would be good to
give a
> >>>>> quick update on where I am at the moment:
> >>> <snip>
> >>>>> Now you can run javac.
> >>>> Very cute!  Do you intend module/tools to remain not part of the build?
> >>> It will become part of the build once it is as-good-as done.
> >>>
> >>> I'm trying to do a balancing act between /not/ dumping my junk into SVN
> >>> as I go along, and developing in the open | collaboratively.
> >>> Suggestions for re-balancing are more than welcome.
> >> Only suggestion is to do a branches/tim/stuff1, work in there if you
> >> want people to comment (with the bonus of having it in SVN in case of
> >> problem).
> >>
> >> It's COW so the space usage won't be that bad, and you can just delete
> >> when done.
> > 
> > While that's true, I think that development on branches has other costs:
> > 
> >  * merging back into trunk
> > 
> >  * fewer people will pay attention - nothing personal but I might be
> >    less inclined to scan commits in branches/tim than trunk ;-)
> Right, but right now he's not putting anything in trunk.  So you have no 
> hope of seeing anything.
> And it doesn't matter.  If you aren't interested in what he's doing, 
> don't look at it.  if you are, you are engaged anyway.
> > Personally, I think development is moving fast enough that it's not a
> > problem having it in trunk.  If it hadn't been in trunk, I might have
> > been less inclined to test it ... and not had the incentive to fix the
> > bugs (HARMONY-510) on my platform of choice.
> Are we talking about two different things?  Tim was saying that he 
> wanted to avoid dumping 'junk' into SVN, yet wants to work more in the open.
> Working in a branch is a great way to do it.
> > 
> > Obviously, we should avoid breaking things like this for too long but I
> > think the occasional breakage is a fair price to pay for not having the
> > other costs.
> > 
> > Of course, I seem to be the only one who even noticed this problem.
> Which problem?

HARMONY-510 is causing every java invocation to exit with a glibc memory
corruption crash.  Which causes all the IBM vme/harmony hosted bits of
our builds to break - they "work" but ant sees the bad return code.

> It's going to be the case that people will want to go off into a 
> 'corner' and try something.  it's nice that they can do it so others can 
>   watch, help, participate, and still it is out of the mainstream 
> codebase until that person or people want to bring it in (or propose to 
> bring it in).
> The merging would be their problem, just as it would be if they were 
> just working at home or in the office on a private copy.
> The benefits seem obvious.

Sure, yes.  I missed the point.  You are absolutely right.

I thought Tim was concerned because he'd already dumped "junk" into
svn. ;-) I was pointing out that I didn't think it was a big deal - and
anyway it's really cool "junk" that I like to see.


Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org

View raw message