Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91061 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2006 15:02:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Apr 2006 15:02:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 70433 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2006 15:02:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 70376 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2006 15:02:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 70365 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2006 15:02:51 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:02:51 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of anton.avtamonov@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.201] (HELO nz-out-0102.google.com) (64.233.162.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:02:50 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id v1so1788098nzb for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:02:29 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PLIxR3uMRquhKQRySIebhVkvUlmSgpct67Ynw6bKf3LuuMifKKjZG0bbwRv0hYXv3naASKoevtL8dKTdRnUfBnl43CVUmRYVCDQ3TZcKuX6BHYUF2kEEMEHSchXjBqs1DwMFxUZFkcE49rRH3CNAwaEnW489roVpZjCA+KAcha8= Received: by 10.65.235.7 with SMTP id m7mr2505721qbr; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.251.20 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46d21a9a0604270802y7c9a77cl790feb421962a4a4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:02:29 +0400 From: "Anton Avtamonov" To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?Re:_[classlib]_Tests_for_seria?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?lization_=96_which_package,_name=3F?= In-Reply-To: <46d21a9a0604270755q1fbbc334p2b612aaa033a5778@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <6e47b64f0604262103kf9343edu13732a9d56338191@mail.gmail.com> <44507EAF.9090500@pobox.com> <6e47b64f0604270546i6c925fbbgb73c41b260259bf0@mail.gmail.com> <4450D85C.4000604@gmail.com> <46d21a9a0604270755q1fbbc334p2b612aaa033a5778@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 4/27/06, Anton Avtamonov wrote: > On 4/27/06, Tim Ellison wrote: > > I say leave them mixed. We are no more likely to want to run > > serialization tests separately than we are locking tests etc. and tryin= g > > to layout the tests on disk to represent all the different metadata > > about each test case is not going to work. > > +1. usually we have test layout like: one class - one TestCase. I > don't see big reason to support several layouts simultaneously > (class-based, serialization-based, etc.) Just to be clear: I would prefer "option 3" from the original Stepan's post: to have serialization test methods inside TestCase for the class. -- Anton Avtamonov, Intel Middleware Products Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org