Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of anton.avtamonov@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.162.197 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=fuMHDGU48d6yIKb/Kp1X2HTTUpCH+3KScADpegJsKqu4B2cYFsn9zDbzZ+2hKG+xUuWF7l+rXw9XFewnbkatTLlC2d6+HgQ/IzR9z8Ipq5eeDlal++nc2fhHU4yqPhw/ymYrtmsHg/DYY0MQuWyQo/lxz3DVTPZuT1bPhJAeETc=
Message-ID: <46d21a9a0604170155l18da5a8k5e2225e0cdee2ea4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:55:37 +0400
From: "Anton Avtamonov" <anton.avtamonov@gmail.com>
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: should strings in exceptions match the reference implementation?
In-Reply-To: <4d0b24970604170147j3bcccdc1iec99bf3241653ff9@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <fcb9f9160604151344p5995c843x18b5aaf3f9554d7f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <46d21a9a0604162306q73e0a474hca0d4a15bc8d66ed@mail.gmail.com>
	 <906dd82e0604162314w718bbc39ie266dc63da24c6a0@mail.gmail.com>
	 <46d21a9a0604162325r57f4e420t1eb9e56fafde46d8@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4d0b24970604162336w8580472y49507407c268966f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <46d21a9a0604162346g1bbba723u4a5f2f0aa25bb2f6@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4d0b24970604170019n6a85f398n16032db0a5492be7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <46d21a9a0604170037y225d0511i5377968a365d122e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <44434E04.9020905@gmail.com>
	 <4d0b24970604170147j3bcccdc1iec99bf3241653ff9@mail.gmail.com>

I also agree.
The only 'requirement' I would add is that it should be possible to do
such mark-up on per-check basis rather than per-test_method or even
per-test_class basic. Because each testMehtod() may have several
checks only few of them will be harmony-dependent.

--
Anton Avtamonov,
Intel Middleware Products Division


On 4/17/06, Andrew Zhang <zhanghuangzhu@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1. Annotation is a good way to deliver such information.
>
>
>
> On 4/17/06, Paulex Yang <paulex.yang@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I consider the isHarmony() should be metadata, I have concerns to hard
> > code in test cases. How about mark these test cases as "non-compatible"
> > by annotation, by naming convention or more directly by some list, and
> > use test script to handle them?
> > > --
> > > Anton Avtamonov,
> > > Intel Middleware Products Division
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.or=
g
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Paulex Yang
> > China Software Development Lab
> > IBM
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Zhang
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org