Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of anton.avtamonov@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.162.193 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=cWhLa69Cexiq4U6OzseLRacBiQVXopztsdPWRPuKcnMkREyd3EQnDGWqKwz4fX8T4itAdt2zbmQF0W4AY4jaDDCsImGW9MkVKFgUa0B+oX4dYMnqhRtnip+LfNmVHFNP2yxOmNHu/WBCiYKaiH/XXUXMXLHNKRFnYoxaQbkT3T0=
Message-ID: <46d21a9a0604120610v7cef973due0e3dadab117cdc9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:10:23 +0400
From: "Anton Avtamonov" <anton.avtamonov@gmail.com>
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: classlib test suite status emails?
In-Reply-To: <906dd82e0604120607t678b80b7h8cd5d05ebe55d7c@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <6e47b64f0604102118p62086311red3af9af86f6c76e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <443B9ABD.7020805@googlemail.com>
	 <6e47b64f0604112159i1f679d52ha29531afa4ac6a29@mail.gmail.com>
	 <46d21a9a0604112320j1dd96c23i77e2c57002b11292@mail.gmail.com>
	 <443CC8CC.8050706@googlemail.com>
	 <46d21a9a0604120304u261f9b61x81385f2a67f0b094@mail.gmail.com>
	 <443CDB04.2020009@googlemail.com> <443CED7D.3080104@pobox.com>
	 <46d21a9a0604120559y4ea67d01kdd3fb4b333da4b71@mail.gmail.com>
	 <906dd82e0604120607t678b80b7h8cd5d05ebe55d7c@mail.gmail.com>

Well, you will need to build-up dependency info anyway, right?
Therefore probably that would be a good chance to revise and update
manifests :-)?

--
Anton Avtamonov,
Intel Middleware Products Division

On 4/12/06, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> BTW AFAIK we do not test whether manifests list all imports/exports
>
> So if we create data from manifests then it could be insufficient and
> we might have the same failures we had yesterday.
>
> Thanks,
> Mikhail
>
> 2006/4/12, Anton Avtamonov <anton.avtamonov@gmail.com>:
> > On 4/12/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> > > Why have a static file?  Why not just generate from the modules
> > > manifests?  Then the error can only be in one place - the dependent
> > > module... right?
> >
> > If they have enough info - of course! That would be excellent.
> > I suppose it is a bit not trivial since the required information is
> > not the modules the particular module is depended on, but all the
> > modules which depend on the particular module. However it should be
> > not hard to revert.
> > Did I catch your idea right?
> >
> > --
> > Anton Avtamonov,
> > Intel Middleware Products Division
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org