Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27763 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2006 01:10:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Apr 2006 01:10:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 42261 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2006 01:10:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 42176 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2006 01:10:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 42121 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2006 01:10:06 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:10:06 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: 64.74.244.71 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of geir@pobox.com) Received: from [64.74.244.71] (HELO chi.mobile-health-diary.com) (64.74.244.71) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:10:05 -0700 Received: (qmail 31381 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2006 01:09:43 -0000 Received: from ool-43560634.dyn.optonline.net (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (geir@67.86.6.52) by b014.internal.mobile-health-diary.com with SMTP; 27 Apr 2006 01:09:43 -0000 Message-ID: <44501941.901@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:07:13 -0500 From: Geir Magnusson Jr Reply-To: geir@pobox.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [classlib] Testing References: <44213FE0.4070103@pobox.com> <20060322124056.GL45952@bali.sjc.webweaving.org> <44214AF4.1060602@pobox.com> <20060322135033.GO45952@bali.sjc.webweaving.org> <44215E72.2050203@pobox.com> <44230B8A.1000309@googlemail.com> <906dd82e0604252024o6fd2a212h92bcb83c5ec29d1@mail.gmail.com> <444F2F44.8050405@googlemail.com> <444F331F.4010001@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <444F331F.4010001@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Oliver Deakin wrote: > George Harley wrote: >> Mikhail Loenko wrote: >> Of course, the text module has only "implementation-independent tests >> that designed to be run from classpath". For modules that have got >> implementation-specific tests then I suppose we could use something >> like "org.apache.harmony.[module].tests.impl.[package under test]" or >> "org.apache.harmony.[module].tests.internal.[package under test]" etc. >> I've got no preference. > > I think impl is preferable over internal here, as we already use > internal in our implementation package names to indicate classes totally > internal to that bundle. To also use internal to label tests that are > implementation specific may cause confusion. I think the whole 'internal' thing is just awful IMO. (Man, it feels good to stay that...) Why do we need it? Eclipse? OSGi? Isn't it pre-supposing a packaging system in the source code structur? (one that I think is pretty unnatural for java programmers....) I'm 100% behind offering the Harmony classlibs packaged for OSGi, but I'm 100% against assuming it's the only way to go... geir --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org