Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71483 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2006 20:28:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Apr 2006 20:28:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 96012 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2006 20:28:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 95601 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2006 20:28:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 95579 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2006 20:28:49 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 13:28:49 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [200.42.0.187] (HELO postino14.prima.com.ar) (200.42.0.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 13:28:48 -0700 Received: (qmail 95002 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2006 20:28:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO adrastea) (danielgandara@201.252.159.221) by postino14.prima.com.ar with SMTP; 7 Apr 2006 20:28:24 -0000 Message-ID: <01a501c65a81$e4c0f610$c900a8c0@neosur.com> From: "Daniel Gandara" To: Subject: [rmi] getting 1.4 bytecode Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 17:28:54 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, As discussed with Oliver, I built the rmi code with the -target jsr14 option and I got a 1.4 bytecode for the package. I run our test suit against the package and it seems to work ok. This is a sum up of the experience: 1) -target jsr14 option only worked with Sun's compiler, I could not make it work on Eclipse... 2) I had to make changes to the code, basically I had to change enums and change/remove java.util.concurrent classes we use (ConcurrentHashMap and ThreadPoolExecutor) note: there is obviously a performance penalty due to 2). The question I have now is if I should send this modified code to be used in Harmony during this transitional phase or not. What do you think? I'll be waitting for comments, Daniel --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org