Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16759 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2006 00:33:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Apr 2006 00:33:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 22433 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2006 00:33:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22375 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2006 00:33:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22363 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2006 00:33:24 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:33:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of nbeyer@kc.rr.com designates 24.94.166.116 as permitted sender) Received: from [24.94.166.116] (HELO ms-smtp-04.rdc-kc.rr.com) (24.94.166.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:33:22 -0700 Received: from LITTLEGUY (CPE-24-31-248-236.kc.res.rr.com [24.31.248.236]) by ms-smtp-04.rdc-kc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3P0WvV3007606 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:32:59 -0500 (CDT) From: "Nathan Beyer" To: Subject: RE: [admin] Split the list (was RE: Split the list ?) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:33:06 -0500 Message-ID: <004501c667ff$d3c60810$1201a8c0@LITTLEGUY> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-reply-to: <444CD7C1.9020108@sablevm.org> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Thread-index: AcZnpk/wAFy9inU1S36/oKvwqjb7hgAWMkJg X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I'll add my vote to using the [topic] markers. This works well for other Apache projects like Jakarta Commons. I think they've split of some separate mailing lists, but this was based on the sheer volume for certain projects. I'd also add using the [topic] markers in subject line of JIRA issues too, but that may not be everyone's liking. -Nathan > -----Original Message----- > From: Etienne Gagnon [mailto:egagnon@sablevm.org] > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 8:51 AM > To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [admin] Split the list (was RE: Split the list ?) > > I agree with Geir. It's a good idea to keep classlib and vm people > aware of what the others are doing. Sometimes, issues that might seem > unrelated by classlib or vm people might actually affect the other > group. I much prefer the suggested [topic] approach. > > Etienne > > Magnusson, Geir wrote: > > I've thought about it, but I think that it's a bit premature. Why? > > Because I think that once we fracture the list traffic, we lose a lot of > > the intermixing that's important. > > > > I think once we have a lot more VM traffic, it makes perfect sense. > > > > However, I think that as an intermediate step though we should all work > > very hard to tag our subject lines with a [topic] :) > > -- > Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D. http://www.info2.uqam.ca/~egagnon/ > SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/ > SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org