harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mikhail Loenko" <mloe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] Tests for serialization – which package, name?
Date Fri, 28 Apr 2006 05:56:01 GMT
2006/4/27, Anton Avtamonov <anton.avtamonov@gmail.com>:
> On 4/27/06, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I say leave them mixed.  We are no more likely to want to run
> > serialization tests separately than we are locking tests etc. and trying
> > to layout the tests on disk to represent all the different metadata
> > about each test case is not going to work.
>
> +1. usually we have test layout like: one class - one TestCase. I

Sometimes we need different setUp and tearDown operations
for different tests against the same class. This is best to be handled as
multiple TestCases (or test classes in other words as TestCase can be ambiguous)

Thanks,
Mikhail



> don't see big reason to support several layouts simultaneously
> (class-based, serialization-based, etc.)
>
> --
> Anton Avtamonov,
> Intel Middleware Products Division
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message