harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "LvJimmy,Jing" <firep...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: matching reference implementation exception behaviour
Date Tue, 11 Apr 2006 02:25:56 GMT
Hi:

    I think we never dicide that we should follow RI rather than the spec.
The spec is the first principle we should follow. However if the spec does
not tell us the detail of an action, then it's the time to follow RI.
    That is true that RI changes from time to time in every release. :)

2006/4/11, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com>:
>
> BTW, when we were deciding that we follow RI rather then the spec, we
> cared about breaking existing implementations. But if RI changed its
> behavior
> from being compatible to the spec in 1.4 to being incompatible in 1.5 then
> do
> we believe that existing applications more likely stick to the latest
> (1.5) version?
>
> Or if the spec is ambiguous and RI changed behavior from 1.4 to 1.5?
>
> Example JIRA-266 and "Re: [jira] Created: (HARMONY-266)
> java.security.Signature.getInstance(String,Provider) should match 5.0
> reference implementations behaviour" mail thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Mikhail
>
>

Best Regards!

Jimmy, Jing Lv
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message