harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Liang <richard.lian...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] Tests for serialization – which package, name?
Date Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:48:04 GMT
Anton Avtamonov wrote:
> On 4/27/06, Anton Avtamonov <anton.avtamonov@gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> On 4/27/06, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
>>     
>>> I say leave them mixed.  We are no more likely to want to run
>>> serialization tests separately than we are locking tests etc. and trying
>>> to layout the tests on disk to represent all the different metadata
>>> about each test case is not going to work.
>>>       
>> +1. usually we have test layout like: one class - one TestCase. I
>> don't see big reason to support several layouts simultaneously
>> (class-based, serialization-based, etc.)
>>     
>
> Just to be clear: I would prefer "option 3" from the original Stepan's
> post: to have serialization test methods inside TestCase for the
> class.
>   
+1. We have not clear requirement to separate serialization test from 
other tests. ;-)
> --
> Anton Avtamonov,
> Intel Middleware Products Division
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>   


-- 
Richard Liang
China Software Development Lab, IBM 


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message