harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: matching reference implementation exception behaviour
Date Tue, 04 Apr 2006 07:56:16 GMT
Anton Avtamonov wrote:
> On 4/3/06, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Anton Avtamonov wrote:
>>> The way how we document them is a special JIRA category, right? So,
>>> tracking each deviation independent allows us to discuss them and
>>> change the category in case we would like to preserve the deviation.
>>> Makes sense?
>> Is anyone suggesting that these should not be fixed?
> Well, probably I expressed my idea not clearly enough, sorry for that.
> What I tried to say is that if we have separate jira issue for each
> deviation and then will be decided that the deviation should not be
> fixed we can easily change the category ('Component/s' field) of this
> issue to be 'Non-bug differences from RI'.
> At the other hand, if we have several differences in the single jira
> issue and then decide that one of the differences should not be fixed
> we will have to create a separate jira record to document this
> deviation.

I hope that we will have so few deviations that the second approach
seems preferable to me -- but I don't feel strongly about it.



Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
IBM Java technology centre, UK.

Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org

View raw message