harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Hindess <mark.hind...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] Testing
Date Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:42:05 GMT

On 27 April 2006 at 3:16, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> > 
> > The question is where we put 'classpath' test. If we put them into
> > o.a.h.module.tests.[package under test] we result in that ugly
> > package names like
> > o.a.h.security.tests.o.a.h.security.util
> Why not
>     o.a.h.security.tests.util
> ?

Exactly.  After the prefix we can drop any repetition and still have
a reasonably clear mapping between code and the tests that test them.
We'd only have a problem if we created classes like:




but I can't see any logical reason to why we'd do that.

Paulex wrote:

> I consider the module name is optional and can be removed

I think we should consider the module name a mandatory part of the
prefix (for classes where we have the freedom to specify the prefix
obviously).  It's mandatory for the o.a.h classlib classes it should be
for the tests too.


Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org

View raw message