harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel Gandara" <danielgand...@neosur.com>
Subject Re: Contribution of RMI framework
Date Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:17:08 GMT
Vasily, 

    I'm reviewing your implementation, I believe there is a lot to learn 
about other's solution to the same problem :)  and I'm wondering 
if you can send me some top level design documentation about your 
package.

Thanks,

Daniel

PS: if you happen to need it you can find more info about our design
here http://www.itc.unc.edu.ar/javadev/rmi/architecture.html

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Daniel Gandara" <danielgandara@neosur.com>
To: <harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: Contribution of RMI framework


>I completelly agree with Vasily, doing test and performance analysis 
> on RMI is not a trivial task; I'll coordinate with him the best way to 
> compare the packages.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Zakharov, Vasily M" <vasily.m.zakharov@intel.com>
> To: <harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 1:17 PM
> Subject: RE: Contribution of RMI framework
> 
> 
> Hi, Mikhail,
> 
> Regretfully, the method-to-method comparison would hardly be effective
> with RMI, as it's a highly integrated component.
> 
> 80% of implementation is hidden in non-public API, and some components
> (e. g. RMIC) have no public API at all. So it's hard to plug just one
> public method from one implementation to another without modifying
> non-public code - and non-public code could have (and probably does
> have) very different structure in different implementations.
> 
> What we really can do is try to run both these implementations and
> compare them for conformance to the specification, compatibility with
> reference implementation, maybe stability, performance, visual code
> quality etc. I'm now planning to do some of these, so we'd get some
> results pretty soon.
> 
> Vasily
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:mloenko@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 7:53 AM
> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Contribution of RMI framework
> 
> I think we need compare contributions method by method to assemble
> the best classlib
> 
> Thanks,
> Mikhail
> 
> 2006/4/14, Daniel Gandara <danielgandara@neosur.com>:
>> Vasily,
>>        good to know that there is someone out there who has also
>> been working on rmi; I believe we'll have a lot to share and discuss
>>  about it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Zakharov, Vasily M" <vasily.m.zakharov@intel.com>
>> To: <harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 9:53 PM
>> Subject: Contribution of RMI framework
>>
>>
>> Hi, all,
>>
>> I would like to announce the next code contribution to Harmony project
>> on
>> behalf of Intel corporation. This contribution contains the
>> implementation
>> of RMI framework.
>>
>> The archive with this contribution can be found at:
>>
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-337
>>
>> The Remote Method Invocation (RMI) framework enables an object in one
>> virtual machine to call methods of an object in another one, to create
>> applications distributed on various Java virtual machines on the same
>> or different hosts.
>>
>> For more information please see the documentation contained in the
>> bundle.
>>
>> The code is a result of efforts of Intel Middleware Product Division
>> team.
>> One should be able to run this code with a 1.4+ compatible JRE/VM (was
>> tested using commercial VMs). No classes require special support from
>> the VM.
>> All code is pure Java. The implementation is done according to Java
> 1.4
>> specification of RMI.
>>
>> The archive contains the README file that explains the building and
>> running
>> process for this code. If any additional comments or clarifications
> are
>> needed, feel free to contact me. I will be happy to answer all
> questions
>> about this contribution and to participate in its further
>> development/maintenance and integration into Harmony.
>>
>> Vasily Zakharov
>> Intel Middleware Product Division
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message