Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 78189 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2006 11:29:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2006 11:29:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 33211 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2006 11:29:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 33161 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2006 11:29:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 33150 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2006 11:29:16 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 03:29:16 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of stepan.mishura@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.199] (HELO nproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.182.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 03:29:14 -0800 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id k27so250043nfc for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 03:28:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=piYIKdeE7vAAjeWWB83mpS57nLIEOE5N787YCxwX2kfT2jZQnNK05sbReR2d8wXsAhDwmMi+aCIhrnb2TSgkFTIknedliOiC0PusMx5Q+V0eY0U+TnCsM71uSbCKgnz73kUluVSt1E/0U46ShJTtPiXdeQlsjJv//X8XyXDsHaI= Received: by 10.49.87.19 with SMTP id p19mr769294nfl; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 03:28:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.9.20 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 03:28:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6e47b64f0603160328k23a8a738h83af2b6149b052b6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:28:52 +0600 From: "Stepan Mishura" To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r386058 [1/49] ... In-Reply-To: <441935D0.6070604@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_922_23713596.1142508532107" References: <20060315122239.87813.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <20060315193244.GA45422@bali.sjc.webweaving.org> <6e47b64f0603160011j5726ea6auba3662ba658ae0a0@mail.gmail.com> <441935D0.6070604@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_922_23713596.1142508532107 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 3/16/06, Tim Ellison wrote: > > Stepan Mishura wrote: > > Leo, > > > > I agree with you that big commits are hard to review and to understand > what > > was changed. Why not to partition them? > > They are incoming contributions that were committed in bulk and > reference the original JIRA. We have all had a chance to look at the > contributions and vote on them already. > > > At least I don't understand why > > HARMONY-57 and HARMONY-88 were committed in one day. > > Why not? > > > Integrating these two > > contributions of course changed the build: wow, the build now downloads > > resources from the net and it failed to do this ... > > I agree, I don't like this either. It will be fixed. > > > downloading them by > > hands ... opsss, no property IdontHappyWithNetworkBuildUseLocalCopies > ... > > hacking the ant script .... wow, the script to run test trying to > download > > the same resources ... hacking the script ... hmmm, there are failed > tests, > > what is wrong? .... aha, old known problems ... well, are there any > other > > surprises? :-) > > C'mon Stepan, we are in a period of change while these bulk > contributions are merged into the code base. There are a few bumps in > the road but they are being sorted out quickly, and the result is a much > more functional runtime and lots more tests. Please lend a hand rather > than sniping from the sidelines :-( Me shooting....? Oh, no ... please don't interpret my words in this way. Thanks, Stepan. Regards, > Tim > > > Thanks, > > Stepan Mishura > > Intel Middleware Products Division > > > > > > On 3/16/06, Leo Simons wrote: > >> 49 commit messages for a single commit! The continuous wash-in of > >> Really Big(tm) chunks of code scares me a little (even if its real > cool) > >> -- usually I make it policy to read every single line of code > contributed > >> to a project for which I'm on the PMC but there's no chance in hell I'= m > >> going to spend an entire weekend reading unit tests. Just keeping up > >> amounts > >> to something close to a fulltime job. The "usual" "oversight" model > that > >> at > >> least some parts of the ASF are used to seems near-impossible to apply > >> here. > >> > >> Will all people able to read every line of code as it comes in please > >> raise > >> their hands? > >> > >> I'm thinking about how to make this stuff scale. Any ideas? The natura= l > >> tendency is to want to partition, but that way we lose the "many eyes" > >> advantages.... > >> > >> Anyway, just a random thought... > >> > >> - Leo > >> > > > > -- > > Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com) > IBM Java technology centre, UK. > -- Thanks, Stepan Mishura Intel Middleware Products Division ------=_Part_922_23713596.1142508532107--