Return-Path: 
 <harmony-dev-return-5764-apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 7289 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2006 12:52:31 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2006 12:52:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 51703 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2006 12:52:24 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 51659 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2006 12:52:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <harmony-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 51642 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2006 12:52:23 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:52:23 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of george.c.harley@googlemail.com
 designates 64.233.162.207 as permitted sender)
Received: from [64.233.162.207] (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.207)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:52:23 -0800
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x7so142949nzc
        for <harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org>;
 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:52:02 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=googlemail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=RQx6ijFQ0gFHsQ652RmxDeJI6xPkECbq7p8berJ+RwLa/fO5A0AMzo75L1tgHE+XEexbm9D20ZQlfOTncF7gA7vAVg37MrJfJ1Tb6zIgNZT1TqsLoebP1ELGNP/OvfEgQF1wtSxXAetHuvExkI6Hizw3bFlyJ7d0tgLrnz+KAIc=
Received: by 10.37.20.35 with SMTP id x35mr1261443nzi;
        Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:52:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.1.101? ( [86.17.57.72])
        by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 16sm1337488nzo.2006.03.22.04.52.00;
        Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:52:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <44214874.1060103@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 12:52:04 +0000
From: George Harley <george.c.harley@googlemail.com>
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-31) Move peformance timing of unit
 tests into a decorator class.
References: <1337621512.1142944138868.JavaMail.jira@ajax>
 <442015AD.6010705@gmail.com> <4420C616.3010202@pobox.com>
 <442139A0.2020309@googlemail.com> <442140E1.4050503@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <442140E1.4050503@pobox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
>
> George Harley wrote:
>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Tim Ellison wrote:
>>>> I know that you'll be disappointed if I didn't ...
>>>>
>>>> Geir Magnusson Jr (JIRA) wrote:
>>>> <snip>
>>>>>     Resolution: Won't Fix
>>>>>
>>>>> This has been taken care of elsewhere, IIRC.  Resolving for now to 
>>>>> see if there's howls of protest...
>>>>
>>>> How was it resolved?
>>>
>>> I thought there was a patch that removed it.  If there wasn't, happy 
>>> to re-open.
>>>
>>> geir
>>
>> Hi Geir,
>>
>> Is this what you mean ? 
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-55?page=all
>>
>> Personally, I think that HARMONY-31 was awesome :-)
>
> We all do George!
>
>> At least the basic principle of pushing the auxiliary functionality 
>> (in this case timing) up to the test framework is there in the sample 
>> code attachment if anyone else is keen to do more in this area.
>
> Do you think this should be re-opened, or an new JIRA created to keep 
> things clear?
>
> geir

Hi,

My vote is to keep it closed since the original issue has gone away.

Best regards,
George


>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> George
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>