Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30385 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2006 13:51:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2006 13:51:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 2905 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2006 13:51:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 2845 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2006 13:51:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 2833 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2006 13:51:32 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of zoe.slattery@googlemail.com designates 64.233.166.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.178] (HELO pproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.166.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 05:51:32 -0800 Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m51so492312pye for ; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 05:49:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rl9/YWgkgdPI9eVYBdmcib5qNC0bVJNUhkSZiyu9uR0ym7XnQX/mpNn9XgQCviZzY8OnumgMia+7jFVPL+mU8KGlgO20P/L2fzcH9gp4JKvEUMFbuFecoN7p/Qx0Bb1ZscQTkJl1gdEmyDm5ihWhBun/IFfv1VFHZNnbY6zZiVU= Received: by 10.35.78.13 with SMTP id f13mr570010pyl; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 05:49:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?9.20.133.190? ( [195.212.29.75]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id q37sm376175pye.2006.03.07.05.49.50; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 05:49:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <440D8F7B.3080902@googlemail.com> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 13:49:47 +0000 From: zoe slattery User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Component status pages (was:Re: any donations expected for awt and swing?) References: <44073BBE.4060209@gmail.com> <440756BF.5040400@gmail.com> <44075F36.7090904@pobox.com> <440842F2.2030303@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <440842F2.2030303@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Tim Ellison wrote: > Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > >> Tim Ellison wrote: >> >>> Probably best to put the 'concerted work in progress' description on the >>> wiki, so anyone can join in; the website status page was intended to be >>> more of a current state of the code overview. We should also start to >>> set ourselves some goals, in terms of applications to run, etc. >>> >> Why not have "started" on the webpage, and then a like to the wiki page >> if there is one? >> >> Or just encourage people to ask here on the dev list... >> > > Yes, that would be fine. If somebody wants to hack the wiki for module > status pages, I'll volunteer to point to the website to them. > To start with (because it is easier for people to update) I've replicated Tim's table on the Wiki (here:http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/component_development_status). I've linked one component (j.l.mangement) to a seperate page and marked it as "started". How about other people marking up the areas that they are working in? > Regards, > Tim > > >>> If you want to make a start on the wiki page that would be good, or if >>> anyone else has an idea for tracking intent... >>> >>> It's also worth mentioning that I don't believe we should be exclusive >>> about areas of work within, and contribution to, Harmony. >>> >> Absolutely. >> >> >>> While I >>> understand that the goal is to minimize redundant work, we may find >>> ourselves in the situation of having more than one implementation of the >>> same APIs (we already saw this happen with 'security' and 'security2' >>> contributions). This is no bad thing as it allows us to evaluate the >>> best technical option (quickly) and proceed with the combined group of >>> experts collaborating on a single code base. I hope we can continue to >>> do so 'harmoniously'. >>> >> Choice and competition is good. This isn't "live or die" competition, >> but "we can choose best of breed" competition, and we all benefit. There >> are no losers. >> >> geir >> >> >>> Regards, >>> Tim >>> >>> karan malhi wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am writing the interfaces for the javax.accessibility package. Some of >>>> the interfaces are dependent on classes from the awt package. Are we >>>> expecting any donations for awt, swing packages? >>>> If donations are not expected then what approach should I take? Should I >>>> start writing stuff for awt and swing (on which accessibility depends >>>> on) so that accessibility classes compile during a build in harmony? >>>> Please guide me here. >>>> >>>> Secondly, once a volunteer starts working on a "Missing" module as >>>> stated on >>>> http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/classlibrary/status.html >>>> >>>> , should the status be changed to something else like "Work in progress" >>>> or something? >>>> >>>> > >