Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 62709 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2006 09:32:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Mar 2006 09:32:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 33955 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2006 09:31:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 33549 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2006 09:31:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 33538 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2006 09:31:45 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 01:31:45 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of mail@leosimons.com designates 216.218.185.16 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.218.185.16] (HELO bali.sjc.webweaving.org) (216.218.185.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 01:31:43 -0800 Received: from bali.sjc.webweaving.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bali.sjc.webweaving.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2R9VLwH023253 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 01:31:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mail@leosimons.com) Received: (from lsimons@localhost) by bali.sjc.webweaving.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id k2R9VL1B023252 for harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 01:31:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mail@leosimons.com) X-Authentication-Warning: bali.sjc.webweaving.org: lsimons set sender to mail@leosimons.com using -f Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 01:31:21 -0800 From: Leo Simons To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Unit testing revisited Message-ID: <20060327093121.GI11303@bali.sjc.webweaving.org> Mail-Followup-To: Leo Simons , harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org References: <6e47b64f0603230200l3ebdbb76p289b1011bd1e76d4@mail.gmail.com> <4427602A.9000408@pobox.com> <46d21a9a0603270014q6d100b30l1aa6b9d80556378a@mail.gmail.com> <200603271107.51349.chris.gray@kiffer.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200603271107.51349.chris.gray@kiffer.be> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on bali.sjc.webweaving.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Gentlemen! On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 11:07:51AM +0200, mr A wrote: > On Monday 27 March 2006 10:14, mr B wrote: > > On 3/27/06, mr C wrote: > > [SNIP] > > > [SNIP] > > > > [SNIP] > > > > > On 1/1/2006, mr D wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [SNIP] > > > > Hmmm... Lemme support [SNIP] > > Now let me support [SNIP]. The ASF front page says (...) "The Apache projects are characterized by a collaborative, consensus based development process, " (...) That's not just some boilerplate. Consensus is a useful thing. "How should we organize our tests?" has now been the subject of debate for *months* around here, and every now and then much of the same discussion is rehashed. I think it would be more productive to look for things to agree on (such as, "we don't know, but we can find out", or "we have different ideas on that, but there's room for both", or "this way of doing things is not the best one but the stuff is still useful so let's thank the guy for his work anyway") than to keep delving deeper and deeper into these kinds of disagreements. Of course, the ASF front page doesn't say that "apache projects are characterized by a *productive* development process". Its just my feeling that for a system as big as harmony we need to be *very* productive. Think about it. Is your time better spent convincing lots of other people to do their testing differently, or is it better spent writing better tests? Anyhoo. *I* am going to stop participating in this discussion :-) ciao! LSD