Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1457 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2006 19:33:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2006 19:33:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 27728 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2006 19:33:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 27163 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2006 19:33:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 27152 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2006 19:33:10 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:33:10 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of mail@leosimons.com designates 216.218.185.16 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.218.185.16] (HELO bali.sjc.webweaving.org) (216.218.185.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:33:09 -0800 Received: from bali.sjc.webweaving.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bali.sjc.webweaving.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2FJWjje059141 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:32:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mail@leosimons.com) Received: (from lsimons@localhost) by bali.sjc.webweaving.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id k2FJWjIg059140 for harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:32:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mail@leosimons.com) X-Authentication-Warning: bali.sjc.webweaving.org: lsimons set sender to mail@leosimons.com using -f Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:32:45 -0800 From: Leo Simons To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r386058 [1/49] ... Message-ID: <20060315193244.GA45422@bali.sjc.webweaving.org> Mail-Followup-To: Leo Simons , harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org References: <20060315122239.87813.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060315122239.87813.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on bali.sjc.webweaving.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N 49 commit messages for a single commit! The continuous wash-in of Really Big(tm) chunks of code scares me a little (even if its real cool) -- usually I make it policy to read every single line of code contributed to a project for which I'm on the PMC but there's no chance in hell I'm going to spend an entire weekend reading unit tests. Just keeping up amounts to something close to a fulltime job. The "usual" "oversight" model that at least some parts of the ASF are used to seems near-impossible to apply here. Will all people able to read every line of code as it comes in please raise their hands? I'm thinking about how to make this stuff scale. Any ideas? The natural tendency is to want to partition, but that way we lose the "many eyes" advantages.... Anyway, just a random thought... - Leo