harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Magnusson, Geir" <geir.magnus...@intel.com>
Subject Re: ITC's Contribution
Date Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:36:48 GMT
I don't think that you can do full j.u.c w/o support from the vm.

Are you saying that what is there works w/ the oswego code?  It ok if its not complete...
 We can continue w it once we get a v5 vm.

Note to all - no need to only contribute things that are complete.  We're also glad to  have
incomplete things in svn that people are working on / contributing to here in the project....


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Daniel Gandara [mailto:danielgandara@neosur.com]
Sent:	Wed Mar 08 12:26:18 2006
To:	harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject:	Re: ITC's Contribution 

>> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> i.e. have you tried running it with the original code (EDU.oswego.cs.dl)
>> from Doug's website or only the concurrent utils in 5.0 (JSR166)?
> Daniel Gandara wrote:
> we have only tried with the concurrent utils in 5.0, but we will try with
> Doug's and see how it behaves, I'll let you know.

As promised, we've checked EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent package ( 
and while it works beautifully, it seems to not be compliant with the specs 
java.util.concurrent (e.g. it is missing some pieces, such as 
etc). Therefore, I am hesitant of adapting our harmony-compliant package to 
as it may not be acceptable by Harmony once we are done. What do you think?

As stated above, we've checked with JSR166 
(http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/concurrency-interest/index.html )
and we are ok with it, since it complies with the spec. However, I am not 
we can use this as part of Harmony, can we?


View raw message