harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: SableVM? -- ICLA details
Date Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:39:00 GMT

Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> Leo Simons wrote:
>>>> , that that can
>>>> lead to no end of confusion over the actual license of a VM using
>>>> modules from Harmony, if the SableVM developer believes to have a 
>>>> say in
>>>> it.
>>> No I would say that it cannot, since that sablevm developer would at 
>>> a minimum
>>> have licensed the software under the apache license to apache, and 
>>> then apache
>>> would have licensed that software to the end user under the apache 
>>> license, and
>>> what that means is rather clear.
>> It's not clear at all to me from reading the ASL2, so let's spell it 
>> out: Would such a hypothetical developer have a say in the license of 
>> a VM using Harmony's modules or not? Cliff?
> No.

I thought about this for a second more - the apache license is a license 
  from each contributor of their contribution to the licensee, so I 
would guess that yes, any contributor could hypothetically have a say on 
what a licensee does w/in the boundaries of their contribution.

I dunno.  I am not a lawyer, and I'm really tired :)


View raw message