harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r386058 [1/49] ...
Date Wed, 15 Mar 2006 19:42:21 GMT
Yes, the log message is only shown in the first commit message in the set.

That particular commit is the HARMONY-57 bulk contribution that was
voted on by the -dev list.  The other big commit I did today is the
HARMONY-88 bulk contribution that was also accepted by the -dev list.

I'm not *that* productive!


Magnusson, Geir wrote:
> Isn't this the initial commit for somwthing we just voted in?
> (me in car so can't see right now....)
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Leo Simons [mailto:mail@leosimons.com]
> Sent:	Wed Mar 15 11:34:35 2006
> To:	harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject:	Re: svn commit: r386058 [1/49] ...
> 49 commit messages for a single commit! The continuous wash-in of
> Really Big(tm) chunks of code scares me a little (even if its real cool)
>  -- usually I make it policy to read every single line of code contributed
> to a project for which I'm on the PMC but there's no chance in hell I'm
> going to spend an entire weekend reading unit tests. Just keeping up amounts
> to something close to a fulltime job. The "usual" "oversight" model that at
> least some parts of the ASF are used to seems near-impossible to apply here.
> Will all people able to read every line of code as it comes in please raise
> their hands?
> I'm thinking about how to make this stuff scale. Any ideas? The natural
> tendency is to want to partition, but that way we lose the "many eyes"
> advantages....
> Anyway, just a random thought...
> - Leo


Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
IBM Java technology centre, UK.

View raw message