Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82032 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2006 13:33:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 13:33:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 86796 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2006 13:33:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 86738 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2006 13:33:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 86727 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2006 13:33:51 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:33:51 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: 64.74.244.71 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of geir@pobox.com) Received: from [64.74.244.71] (HELO chi.mobile-health-diary.com) (64.74.244.71) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:33:51 -0800 Received: (qmail 10545 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2006 13:33:27 -0000 Received: from 64.221.254.66.ptr.us.xo.net (HELO ?192.168.2.141?) (geir@64.221.254.66) by b014.internal.mobile-health-diary.com with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 13:33:27 -0000 Message-ID: <43F5D07E.3060407@pobox.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:32:46 -0800 From: Geir Magnusson Jr Reply-To: geir@pobox.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [classlib] policy file References: <43F5AE92.1020301@gmail.com> <906dd82e0602170324w7771eceax90d8007ae4a75f85@mail.gmail.com> <43F5B593.2030504@gmail.com> <906dd82e0602170356v2f84a32dj6bdbc097c4702d7e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <906dd82e0602170356v2f84a32dj6bdbc097c4702d7e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Mikhail Loenko wrote: > On 2/17/06, Tim Ellison wrote: >> I meant it's copyright / license block comment. >> >> Same reason every other files does. > > That is not a source code, BTW corresponding RI's files do not have copyrights. We don't care - we put it on all resources. See our generated HTML pages, for example. > >> ...and why drl.policy? any objection to changing it back? > > I'm not sure it is legal to use 'java' unless it is explicitely > required by the spec. > 'java.security' is required by the spec. > > How about 'drl.policy'? s/drl/java/ I'll sit by my mailbox waiting for the letter from Sun legal so no one else has to worry :) geir > > Thanks, > Mikhail > >> Regards, >> Tim >> >> Mikhail Loenko wrote: >>> java.security also does not have a license... >>> >>> Why do you think they have to have a license? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Mikhail >>> >>> On 2/17/06, Tim Ellison wrote: >>>> why has our permissions policy file (in jre/lib/security) gone from >>>> java.policy -> drl.policy, lost its license etc. ? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com) >>>> IBM Java technology centre, UK. >>>> >> -- >> >> Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com) >> IBM Java technology centre, UK. >> > >