Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38174 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2006 16:11:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2006 16:11:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 61779 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2006 16:11:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 61722 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2006 16:11:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 61710 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2006 16:11:05 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:11:04 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of rbloom@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.192 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.192] (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.192) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:11:03 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so592248wri for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:10:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HDResN5b6u3wEVD+KKHirIK85WJA/1lzHHpoLpuXiLigndaOcMBkAaSByNhXMflrw6J4sC861vVIC9hsLVOLL0zVi3ogGpJ654jD8WJ3QAlbphsJdnxmYJdV2iwXIvazvsvE2/x0y1uexACFP0KP1NvLPI6O7wtNX8BB8iwfb2U= Received: by 10.65.22.15 with SMTP id z15mr244577qbi; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:10:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.254.1 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:10:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1f1d9820602110810t7fae932bv652a60cf5acabaf7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:10:42 -0500 From: Ryan Bloom To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Using APR for Harmony's native link to the OS? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060210135919.26633.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <43ECA917.3020203@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N As one of the original authors of APR, I would like to suggest that instead of using OS dependant native code, when we get to the point of writing awt, we should create an apr-window project, and create the library for the abstraction layer. I have had enough conversations with other APR developers to be relatively certain that this idea would be well received. Ryan On 2/11/06, Alexey Petrenko wrote: > > What do you think? > I think that's using Apache Portable Runtime in Apache Harmony is > natural and good idea. > > However we should understand that APR does not have ALL the needed > functionality. For example APR does not have graphical and window > management functions. So at least awt will need to use OS dependent > native code. > > -- > Alexey A. Petrenko > Intel Middleware Products Division > -- Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org rbb@rkbloom.net rbloom@gmail.com