harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mikhail Loenko <mloe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] policy file
Date Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:56:17 GMT
On 2/17/06, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> I meant it's copyright / license block comment.
>
> Same reason every other files does.

That is not a source code, BTW corresponding RI's files do not have copyrights.

>
> ...and why drl.policy? any objection to changing it back?

I'm not sure it is legal to use 'java'  unless it is explicitely
required by the spec.
'java.security' is required by the spec.

How about 'drl.policy'?

Thanks,
Mikhail

>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> > java.security also does not have a license...
> >
> > Why do you think they have to have a license?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mikhail
> >
> > On 2/17/06, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> why has our permissions policy file (in jre/lib/security) gone from
> >> java.policy -> drl.policy, lost its license etc. ?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Tim
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
> >> IBM Java technology centre, UK.
> >>
> >
>
> --
>
> Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
> IBM Java technology centre, UK.
>

Mime
View raw message