harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mikhail Loenko <mloe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] proposal to revisit componentization for security (was: Re: problems with security2)
Date Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:38:07 GMT
Geir

Sounds like no one objects to the proposal itself, the discussion is about the
naming. Could you please approve/decline new componentization?

Thanks,
Mikhail

On 1/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>
> Stepan Mishura wrote:
> >> Sounds dirty.  How about security-x?
> >>
> >
> > Ok. I named it by analogy with x-net. Your variant works for me.
>
> x-net has the same issue for me.  I figure that net-x is better too
> because it will sit next to net in a directory/IDE package tree, etc...
> (just like security-x near security)
>
> geir
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stepan
> >
> >
> > On 1/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> >> Sounds dirty.  How about security-x?
> >>
> >> Stepan Mishura wrote:
> >>> I agree with the proposal and I'm ready to start working on a patch for
> >>> splitting 'security2' into suggested components and integrating them
> >> with
> >>> the current build.
> >>>
> >>> Also I'd like to suggest a name for a new component: 'x-security'.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Stepan Mishura
> >>> Intel Middleware Products Division
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 1/19/06, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Hello
> >>>>
> >>>> Let's start a different thread for that.
> >>>>
> >>>> I suggest revisiting current componentization for security related
> >> parts.
> >>>> Now we have for example crypto architecture in security module but
> >>>> crypto extension in the crypto module.
> >>>>
> >>>> See natural components in the UserGuide
> >>>> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/
> >>>>
> >>>> The proposal is to have 3 components:
> >>>> 1. general security & crypto
> >>>> 2. ssl
> >>>> 3. jaas
> >>>>
> >>>> The logical content of those components would be:
> >>>> 1.
> >>>> - General Security
> >>>> - Certification Path
> >>>> - JCE
> >>>>
> >>>> 2.
> >>>> - JSSE
> >>>>
> >>>> 3.
> >>>> - JAAS
> >>>> - JGSS
> >>>> - SASL
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Physical content of those components:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1.
> >>>> java.security
> >>>> javax.crypto
> >>>> javax.security.cert
> >>>> 2.
> >>>> javax.net
> >>>> 3.
> >>>> javax.security w/o javax.security.cert
> >>>> org.ietf
> >>>>
> >>>> Opinions?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Mikhail Loenko
> >>>> Intel Middleware Products Division
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Stepan Mishura
> > Intel Middleware Products Division
> >
>

Mime
View raw message