harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-frederic Clere <jfcl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jchevm] APR issues
Date Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:45:14 GMT
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:

>
>
> Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
>
>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Tim Ellison wrote:
>>
>
>>>> No we didn't agree to do that Enrico, for the reasons I described 
>>>> above.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Just to reinforce... no, we didn't agree to that.
>>>
>>> I think that the notion leveraging APR for implementing the 
>>> portability layer for the VM was what we didn't disagree on.  ( I 
>>> won't claim agreement...)
>>>
>>> But that's way different than APR for the class lib portlib.
>>
>>
>> So you have to create a apr.IA32 class lib, don't you?
>
>
> I think I don't understand the question.
>
> Yes, we can do an implementation using APR, but what I thought was 
> driving this discussion was the idea that we could abandon portlib and 
> tie everything directly to the APR API.

Ok, I understand better the idea: no apr portlib but everything in the 
jchecvm.

>
> Using APR to implement the porting layer for the VM/classlib is just 
> peachy - it saves us oodles of work.
>
> geir
>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Jean-Frederic
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> geir
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


Mime
View raw message