harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] policy file
Date Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:39:54 GMT
Actually, looking at it, it makes no sense to have this coming from 
module/security anyway.

I'll revert to using the one from depends/files

geir


Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> 
> 
> Mikhail Loenko wrote:
>> On 2/17/06, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I meant it's copyright / license block comment.
>>>
>>> Same reason every other files does.
>>
>> That is not a source code, BTW corresponding RI's files do not have 
>> copyrights.
> 
> We don't care - we put it on all resources.  See our generated HTML 
> pages, for example.
> 
>>
>>> ...and why drl.policy? any objection to changing it back?
>>
>> I'm not sure it is legal to use 'java'  unless it is explicitely
>> required by the spec.
>> 'java.security' is required by the spec.
>>
>> How about 'drl.policy'?
> 
> s/drl/java/
> 
> I'll sit by my mailbox waiting for the letter from Sun legal so no one 
> else has to worry :)
> 
> geir
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mikhail
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Tim
>>>
>>> Mikhail Loenko wrote:
>>>> java.security also does not have a license...
>>>>
>>>> Why do you think they have to have a license?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Mikhail
>>>>
>>>> On 2/17/06, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> why has our permissions policy file (in jre/lib/security) gone from
>>>>> java.policy -> drl.policy, lost its license etc. ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Tim
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>>
>>>>> Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
>>>>> IBM Java technology centre, UK.
>>>>>
>>> -- 
>>>
>>> Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
>>> IBM Java technology centre, UK.
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message