harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] policy file
Date Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:44:16 GMT
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> On 2/17/06, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I meant it's copyright / license block comment.
>>
>> Same reason every other files does.
> 
> That is not a source code,

Sure it is

>  BTW corresponding RI's files do not have copyrights.
>> ...and why drl.policy? any objection to changing it back?
> 
> I'm not sure it is legal to use 'java'  unless it is explicitely
> required by the spec.

what? like all those .java files?

> 'java.security' is required by the spec.
>
> How about 'drl.policy'?

No

Regards,
Tim

> Thanks,
> Mikhail
> 
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>> Mikhail Loenko wrote:
>>> java.security also does not have a license...
>>>
>>> Why do you think they have to have a license?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mikhail
>>>
>>> On 2/17/06, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> why has our permissions policy file (in jre/lib/security) gone from
>>>> java.policy -> drl.policy, lost its license etc. ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
>>>> IBM Java technology centre, UK.
>>>>
>> --
>>
>> Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
>> IBM Java technology centre, UK.
>>
> 

-- 

Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
IBM Java technology centre, UK.

Mime
View raw message