harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] do we need a global exclude list?
Date Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:36:46 GMT


karan malhi wrote:
> Could there be a switch to over-ride the global exclude list 
> entry/entries? This way a module by default would use a global exclude 
> list and also have the freedom to ignore it and use the module exclude 
> list.

I don't know what having two exclude lists would mean - a test should be 
excluded for a specific reason, and therefore I can't see why one would 
be in the global list, but not in the module list (and vice versa...)


geir

> 
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> However, I did imagine that we'd give the modules a bit of freedom and 
> independence for testing - a global exclude list might impact that?
> 
>>
>>
>> Stepan Mishura wrote:
>>
>>> Did anybody think of creating a 'global' (i.e. shared by all modules)
>>> exclude list or every module will have its own exclude list? Or Harmony
>>> tests will always pass and we don't need it at all :-)
>>
>>
>> That would be the goal :)
>>
>>> I see at least the following benefits of creating 'global' exclude 
>>> list: all
>>> know issues are kept in one well known place (they don't spread between
>>> several private lists)
>>
>>
>> That's true, but....  I always imagined that people would be working 
>> in the modules anyway, so there isn't much gain.
>>
>> also it is easier to create an exclude list for a
>>
>>> target platform, for example, linux.exclude or win.exclude.
>>
>>
>> Yes, that could be.  Interesting idea.
>>
>> However, I did imagine that we'd give the modules a bit of freedom and 
>> independence for testing - a global exclude list might impact that?
>>
>> geir
>>
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Stepan Mishura
>>> Intel Middleware Products Division
>>>
>>
> 

Mime
View raw message