harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: newbie to project-where to start from
Date Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:14:46 GMT
I think we should certainly be using Muave for testing.  However, that 
doesn't remove the need for our own unit tests to be testing 
implementation internals.

Would you like to help us get it working in our build/test framework?

geir

Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> We are using JUnit, so your test class extends junit.framework.TestCase.
>>  Each test method is "public void test_<methodID>()" where <methodID>
is
>> the method under test including param types; e.g. [3].
> 
> Apologies if I'm (re)opening a can of worms here, but is there some reason why
> Harmony isn't collaborating with the existing and extensive Mauve test suite?
> 
> I understand the license issues that prevent closer ties between Harmony and
> Classpath, even if I find them frustrating. But I don't see that there can
> possibly be license issues on a test suite, because individual tests are
> independent of each other so there's no reason they all have to share the same
> license.
> 
> I can't quickly find an explicit statement of Mauve's license on its homepage[1]
> sadly.
> 
> Stuart.
> 
> [1] http://sourceware.org/mauve/
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message