harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: Location for API extensions
Date Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:16:58 GMT


Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> As it said before it is not a good idea to positioning any Harmony classes
> as "extension for the standard API".
> 
> However we can think about creating some standalone utilities library.
> 
> But there are a lot of questions. For example what structure and
> content should such library have. What classes used in Harmony modules we
> should include and what classes we should not include. It's obvious that
> library which simply consists of classes used by different developers in
> different places will look like trash can but not like useful library.

Right.

> 
> From other hand if we are talking about using these useful classes only
> inside Harmony then it's probably a good idea. But we need some procedure
> for moving a class to utilities package and we need to notify developers
> about class capabilities.

I think the key to get this started is to identify some set of 
functionality to focus on...

geir

> 
> --
> Alexey A. Petrenko
> Intel Middleware Products Division

Mime
View raw message