Anton Avtamonov wrote:
> Besides, such approach ties them to Harmony if they found such
> extensions (funtionality, included into packages of 'public access')
> useful :-)
We actually don't want to tie anyone into Harmony other than because
we're free, fast, stable, etc.
This project *may* at some point offer packages that are not part of
J2SE (for example, if we had built a nice logging implementation that
was resuable), but that would clearly be separate parts of the project,
and not to be confused with Harmony the J2SE Implementation.
geir
|