harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] security2 -> security
Date Thu, 09 Feb 2006 12:08:31 GMT


Tim Ellison wrote:
> +1 to consolidating on a single security module.
> I'm also interested to hear what merging Mikhail has in mind.
> 
> I was led to believe that security2 was a proper superset of security,
> so we should be able to do a 'big bang' switch.  The security_orig won't
> be too far away if we need to pull something in.  (Perhaps move it out
> of trunk/modules/ to avoid confusion?)

Right - it will live forever in SVN, and of course we always can "copy 
forward" in time if we need to - i.e. copy from some past rev into 
"now", whenever that is.

I just don't want to lose anything useful that may be in security...

geir

> 
> Regards,
> Tim
> 
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> Before you do that...
>>
>> What are you thinking as your approach?
>>
>> geir
>>
>> Mikhail Loenko wrote:
>>> I suggest merging these two bundles. I can do this and provide a patch...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mikhail
>>>
>>> On 2/9/06, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> security classes are a subset of security2 classes.
>>>>
>>>> security2 is 1.5-ready while security has javadocs. What do you mean
>>>> by 'better'?
>>>> Are there any original approaches or efficient algorithms used in
>>>> security?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Mikhail
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/9/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hm.  I thought security was stubs, but it isn't.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there anything in security/ that we don't have in security2/ or is
>>>>> better?
>>>>>
>>>>> geir
>>>>>
>>>>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>>>>> Unless I hear massive bellowing in opposition, I'm going to move
>>>>>> security -> security_orig and security2 -> security sometime
tomorrow.
>>>>>> Please register protests now...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> geir
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
> 

Mime
View raw message