harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] security2 -> security
Date Thu, 09 Feb 2006 11:54:37 GMT
+1 to consolidating on a single security module.
I'm also interested to hear what merging Mikhail has in mind.

I was led to believe that security2 was a proper superset of security,
so we should be able to do a 'big bang' switch.  The security_orig won't
be too far away if we need to pull something in.  (Perhaps move it out
of trunk/modules/ to avoid confusion?)

Regards,
Tim

Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> Before you do that...
> 
> What are you thinking as your approach?
> 
> geir
> 
> Mikhail Loenko wrote:
>> I suggest merging these two bundles. I can do this and provide a patch...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mikhail
>>
>> On 2/9/06, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> security classes are a subset of security2 classes.
>>>
>>> security2 is 1.5-ready while security has javadocs. What do you mean
>>> by 'better'?
>>> Are there any original approaches or efficient algorithms used in
>>> security?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mikhail
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/9/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>>>> Hm.  I thought security was stubs, but it isn't.
>>>>
>>>> Is there anything in security/ that we don't have in security2/ or is
>>>> better?
>>>>
>>>> geir
>>>>
>>>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>>>> Unless I hear massive bellowing in opposition, I'm going to move
>>>>> security -> security_orig and security2 -> security sometime tomorrow.
>>>>> Please register protests now...
>>>>>
>>>>> geir
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
> 

-- 

Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
IBM Java technology centre, UK.

Mime
View raw message