Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of kumpera@gmail.com designates
 64.233.162.197 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=QNixcRkEsy3B32mBLjkgp9e8WfvIzmVDZqbuaJhwBM/pzOxl8Y2yDq9/IlXjSOt4EoMAk4LUGyqlMcmx9Dqac5MYI5ALmih3887VA1TdFe7ix1pUimL3Cy9VhwIepDyjVD3DFUmsZOWXGMj9He5ptDijNs59a9+BJK+w0YBO0VE=
Message-ID: <8cca42d80601231025x76c1bc88t121f51c2525deb00@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:25:31 -0200
From: Rodrigo Kumpera <kumpera@gmail.com>
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: java.util.concurrent implementation
In-Reply-To: <19e0530f0601231012o714d95aer668c5ff2ee3cc960@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <8cca42d80601230912n3bb9118cx78ed49d6abb65510@mail.gmail.com>
	 <43D51A80.4050109@pobox.com>
	 <19e0530f0601231012o714d95aer668c5ff2ee3cc960@mail.gmail.com>

Some of the concurrent collections have code from the JDK, but these
can be just discarded. The pedigree can be asserted by Doug Lea
himself, I think he is on the list.

It was the intent of the expert group to allow the reference
implementation be used by FOSS jvms.

Rodrigo,

On 1/23/06, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/src/main/readme?annot=
ate=3D1.1
>
> On 1/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> > The question I'd have is who wrote it - is there any exposure risk?
> > "public domain" doesn't mean "clean pedigree"...
> >
> > But yes, certainly worth investigating.  Can you look into it?
> >
> > Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
> > > Can we import the backport of jsr-166 as the starting point for
> > > implementing this package? It's released as public domain, so there
> > > should be not license issue IFAIK.
> > >
> > > There are only a few things required make it work, like removing
> > > references to com.sun.Unsafe.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>