harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From George Harley1 <GHAR...@uk.ibm.com>
Subject Re: [classlib : security[2]] security2 integrated (first cust)
Date Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:15:09 GMT
Hi Geir, 

> I'd like to propose a change in the build structure to segement by 
> platform, so that it's very clear the pile that gets built and where, 
> giving us the freedom to have an appropriate layout for each.
> 
> /trunk/deploy/
>       win32/
>          include/
>          jre/
>       linux/
>          include/
>          jrs/

Sorry but I don't really see the need for this change. A developer is only 
going to be building on one platform at any given time and the existing 
build scripts are already capable of sensing that platform. 

My 2 euro cents.

Best regards,
George
________________________________________
George C. Harley





Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com> 
20/01/2006 15:59
Please respond to
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org


To
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
cc

Subject
[classlib : security[2]] security2 integrated (first cust)






I did a hacky integration of security2 to replace security.

After chatting a bit w/ Tim, I took a very simpleminded approach, of 
just getting the master build.  This only works on windows for now.

1) the main classlib script builds the java code and produces the 
security jar.

2) the main native scrip kicks off the full security2 make and copies 
the .dll out

Clearly we have to improve #2, clearly, but once we verify I didn't 
screw up too badly, then we can do it stepwise.

I'd like to propose a change in the build structure to segement by 
platform, so that it's very clear the pile that gets built and where, 
giving us the freedom to have an appropriate layout for each.

/trunk/deploy/
      win32/
         include/
         jre/
      linux/
         include/
         jrs/


geir




Mime
View raw message