harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mikhail Loenko <mloe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [testing] code for exotic configurations
Date Sat, 28 Jan 2006 08:44:36 GMT
On 1/27/06, Anton Avtamonov <anton.avtamonov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry for being away during the major part of your discussion. Hope
> I'm still not too late.
>
> As I can see currently we have only one 'exotic' situation - some
> tests which are based on providers and use so many provider's
> fucntionality that cannot be replaced with mock objects in a
> reasonable time. Since such tests look like 'system' (use real
> environment) I believe the idea of having separate trees is better.
> Something like:
>
> test/unit
> and
> test/system.

As I wrote earlier in this thread that cause duplication of tests:
we have hundreds tests that might serve both as 'unit' and 'system'


>
> It will be clear that *all* unit tests are run regularly during the
> development and don't need any specifical
> settings/logging/filtering/etc.
>
> --
> Anton Avtamonov,
> Intel Middleware Products Division
>

Mime
View raw message