harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Magnusson, Geir" <geir.magnus...@intel.com>
Subject RE: [RESULT] ( Was Re: [VOTE] Accept JIRA contribution HARMONY-16 (Intel's contrib of security code for classlib))
Date Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:42:36 GMT
inline

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr
geir.magnusson@intel.com
SSG/MPD
+1 203 665 6437  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loenko, Mikhail Y [mailto:mikhail.y.loenko@intel.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 3:53 AM
> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [RESULT] ( Was Re: [VOTE] Accept JIRA 
> contribution HARMONY-16 (Intel's contrib of security code for 
> classlib))
> 
> Thanks for accepting the contribution
> 
> >There's a bit of things that come out of this, like the
> >"com.intel.drl.spec_ref" javadoc tag that we should convert, 
> and such.
> 
> What would be the best for those javadocs? We can have 3 possible
> options:
> 1. Copy-paste from the spec. Not sure it is legal

Absolutely not.  The legality is actually open to honest and genuine
debate - fair use and such - but it's an active issue w/ the EC and
something I'd rather see come to conclusion before "poking the bear".

> 2. Reword the spec. More likely to be legal

100% legit

> 3. Replace the tag with a different one and provide taglet to 
> build the
> doc from the Harmony sources and Sun's spec.

I think we just point to Sun's spec.

> 
> Currently IBM's contribution seems to have #2. Does anyone have an
> opinion?
> 
> Thanks,
> Mikhail Loenko
> Intel Middleware Products Division
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:geir@pobox.com]
> >Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 10:48 PM
> >To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: [RESULT] ( Was Re: [VOTE] Accept JIRA contribution
> HARMONY-16 (Intel's contrib of
> >security code for classlib))
> >
> >
> >
> >Tim Ellison wrote:
> >> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >>>I'll finish moving to SVN and we'll put into the classlib tree, I
> suppose.
> >>
> >>
> >> Great.  Thanks again Mikhail and the team!
> >>
> >> I suggest you either put it into the classlib tree at
> >> "classlib/java-src/security2" or leave it in the sandbox, 
> then we can
> >> merge it into the existing security structure without breaking the
> world.
> >
> >I'll go for the former and try to whip it into common shape, 
> and we can
> >then decide how we do this - drop the existing security if 
> security2 is
> >a superset, or merge.
> >
> >There's a bit of things that come out of this, like the
> >"com.intel.drl.spec_ref" javadoc tag that we should convert, 
> and such.
> >
> >Also will give me a good change to frame out the test infra.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Tim
> >>
> 

Mime
View raw message