harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] proposal to revisit componentization for security (was: Re: problems with security2)
Date Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:32:40 GMT


Stepan Mishura wrote:
>> Sounds dirty.  How about security-x?
>>
> 
> Ok. I named it by analogy with x-net. Your variant works for me.

x-net has the same issue for me.  I figure that net-x is better too 
because it will sit next to net in a directory/IDE package tree, etc... 
(just like security-x near security)

geir

> 
> Thanks,
> Stepan
> 
> 
> On 1/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Sounds dirty.  How about security-x?
>>
>> Stepan Mishura wrote:
>>> I agree with the proposal and I'm ready to start working on a patch for
>>> splitting 'security2' into suggested components and integrating them
>> with
>>> the current build.
>>>
>>> Also I'd like to suggest a name for a new component: 'x-security'.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Stepan Mishura
>>> Intel Middleware Products Division
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/19/06, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>> Let's start a different thread for that.
>>>>
>>>> I suggest revisiting current componentization for security related
>> parts.
>>>> Now we have for example crypto architecture in security module but
>>>> crypto extension in the crypto module.
>>>>
>>>> See natural components in the UserGuide
>>>> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/
>>>>
>>>> The proposal is to have 3 components:
>>>> 1. general security & crypto
>>>> 2. ssl
>>>> 3. jaas
>>>>
>>>> The logical content of those components would be:
>>>> 1.
>>>> - General Security
>>>> - Certification Path
>>>> - JCE
>>>>
>>>> 2.
>>>> - JSSE
>>>>
>>>> 3.
>>>> - JAAS
>>>> - JGSS
>>>> - SASL
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Physical content of those components:
>>>>
>>>> 1.
>>>> java.security
>>>> javax.crypto
>>>> javax.security.cert
>>>> 2.
>>>> javax.net
>>>> 3.
>>>> javax.security w/o javax.security.cert
>>>> org.ietf
>>>>
>>>> Opinions?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Mikhail Loenko
>>>> Intel Middleware Products Division
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Thanks,
> Stepan Mishura
> Intel Middleware Products Division
> 

Mime
View raw message