harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: javadoc vs. doxygen
Date Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:02:02 GMT


Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> 
> 
> Zsejki Sorin Miklós wrote:
>> Doesn't Harmony need Javadoc anyway just in order to be called "Java"?
> 
> No.  IMO, we should *not* be creating a parallel set of javadoc for 
> J2SE.  There already is the standard set produced by the expert group 
> (part of the spec).

To clarify - yes, we need javadoc, but not a re-creation of the spec 
javadoc.     I think we need to augment it with notes about our 
implementation, or clarification on how we interpreted something, but 
lets not reproduce the content already in the docs.

geir


Mime
View raw message