harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: javadoc vs. doxygen
Date Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:00:10 GMT


Tim Ellison wrote:
> Zsejki Sorin Miklós wrote:
>> Doesn't Harmony need Javadoc anyway just in order to be called "Java"?
> 
> Strictly speaking, no.  To be called "Java" you have to pass the JCK
> that AIUI does not test the javadoc tool.  In any case, I think having a
> javadoc would be cool.  Do you have any skills in this area?
> 

We will have javadoc of our code, and we do need need to have notes re 
our impl of java*.*, but I think at all times we should be pointing to 
the spec javadoc, and not re-writing it.

geir

Mime
View raw message