harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: javadoc vs. doxygen
Date Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:00:10 GMT

Tim Ellison wrote:
> Zsejki Sorin Miklós wrote:
>> Doesn't Harmony need Javadoc anyway just in order to be called "Java"?
> Strictly speaking, no.  To be called "Java" you have to pass the JCK
> that AIUI does not test the javadoc tool.  In any case, I think having a
> javadoc would be cool.  Do you have any skills in this area?

We will have javadoc of our code, and we do need need to have notes re 
our impl of java*.*, but I think at all times we should be pointing to 
the spec javadoc, and not re-writing it.


View raw message