harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] proposal to revisit componentization for security (was: Re: problems with security2)
Date Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:52:23 GMT
Sounds dirty.  How about security-x?

Stepan Mishura wrote:
> I agree with the proposal and I'm ready to start working on a patch for
> splitting 'security2' into suggested components and integrating them with
> the current build.
> 
> Also I'd like to suggest a name for a new component: 'x-security'.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stepan Mishura
> Intel Middleware Products Division
> 
> 
> 
> On 1/19/06, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> Let's start a different thread for that.
>>
>> I suggest revisiting current componentization for security related parts.
>> Now we have for example crypto architecture in security module but
>> crypto extension in the crypto module.
>>
>> See natural components in the UserGuide
>> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/
>>
>> The proposal is to have 3 components:
>> 1. general security & crypto
>> 2. ssl
>> 3. jaas
>>
>> The logical content of those components would be:
>> 1.
>> - General Security
>> - Certification Path
>> - JCE
>>
>> 2.
>> - JSSE
>>
>> 3.
>> - JAAS
>> - JGSS
>> - SASL
>>
>>
>> Physical content of those components:
>>
>> 1.
>> java.security
>> javax.crypto
>> javax.security.cert
>> 2.
>> javax.net
>> 3.
>> javax.security w/o javax.security.cert
>> org.ietf
>>
>> Opinions?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mikhail Loenko
>> Intel Middleware Products Division
>>
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 

Mime
View raw message