harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com>
Subject package naming (was: Re: problems with security2)
Date Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:41:44 GMT
I agree with all this.

Tim

Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> 
> 
> Stepan Mishura wrote:
>>> how would you distinguish between support classes for
>>> java.security and javax.security?
>>
>>> we need org.apache.something
>>> and org.apache.extension_of_something
>> What about
>> org.apache.harmony.security
>> org.apache.harmonyx.security
> 
> No.  The project is called "harmony", so that should be the "root" of
> all our java code in the project.  That's the root of our namespace.
> 
> We might add a token after "harmony" like "classlib" (because I think we
> should segment the namespace that way - we don't have to now, but it's a
> minor bit of futureproofing that the tools hide from us anyway....
> 
> and then if there really is a compelling reason to separate out the
> support for java.s and javax.s, do something else.  (I'm not convinced
> we need to)
> 
> Note that
> 
> o.a.h.[c].security
> o.a.h.[c].securityx
> 
> should be ruled out, as  'security' is the Harmony class library module
> name, and that module supports both j.s and  jx.s  (tell me if people
> aren't grokking the shorthand...) and therefore is our "root node" in
> the package tree for the security package.
> 
> geir
> 

-- 

Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
IBM Java technology centre, UK.

Mime
View raw message