harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: problems with security2
Date Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:31:45 GMT


Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> On 1/18/06, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Mikhail Loenko wrote:

>>>
>>> BTW, where will we move "com.openintel.drlx" to?
>>>
>>> org.apache.harmony_x ?
>>> org.apache.harmonx ?
>>> org.apache.hx ?
>> Yuk!  let's stick with org.apache.harmony.<whatever> package names.
> 
> how would you distinguish between support classes for
> java.security and javax.security?

Do we really need to?  I mean, just because "they" got stuck when they 
wanted to add to the security API and needed to add javax doesn't mean 
we need to separate our internal implementation, do we?

> 
> we need org.apache.something
> and org.apache.extension_of_something
> 

That's not clear why to me.

geir

> Thanks,
> Mikhail
> 
> 
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mikhail
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/18/06, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I've just updated from SVN, all unit tests from security2 passed
>>>> (including serialization ones).
>>>> Could you please provide more details?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Mikhail
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>>>>> I am haplessly plodding along.  I found one problem (mine) which fixed
a
>>>>> test, and now I seem to have a more interesting problem with the
>>>>> serialization tests...
>>>>>
>>>>> Are the serialization tests "golden data" files somehow dependent  the
>>>>> com.openintel package structure and would be allergic to a
>>>>> org.apache.harmony package structure?
>>>>>
>>>>> geir
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>>>>> I've been trying to refactor security2 into the org.apache pacakage
space.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm now having test failures.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can someone else do a co of security2 and verify?  I've backed out
the
>>>>>> change so that you need junit and bcprov on your classpath (argh!)
and
>>>>>> turned on haltonfailure so that the tests will stop once something
goes
>>>>>> wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I thought I was being careful - while it's clear that I have no idea
>>>>>> what I'm doing, there's clearly something a little more subtle going
on
>>>>>> here because I wouldn't think that just moving package names would
be a
>>>>>> problem.  I assume that there's some provider or other configuration-ish
>>>>>> issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This would be a good learning experience for all of us how this works.
I
>>>>>> need to run out for about 20 min... bbiab.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> geir
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> --
>>
>> Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
>> IBM Java technology centre, UK.
>>
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message