Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45304 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2005 11:55:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2005 11:55:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 22195 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2005 11:55:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22125 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2005 11:55:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22114 invoked by uid 99); 3 Dec 2005 11:55:28 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 03:55:28 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [66.94.25.112] (HELO mailrelay.t-mobile.com) (66.94.25.112) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 03:56:56 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay.t-mobile.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C7B99DB for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 06:55:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailrelay.t-mobile.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailrelay.t-mobile.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01997-09 for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 06:55:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.240.76.204] (204.76.240.10.in-addr.arpa [10.240.76.204]) by mailrelay.t-mobile.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 06:55:04 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <4390AD43.4000405@eldiablo.co.uk> References: <20051128151614.GE18332@bali.sjc.webweaving.org> <1133420625.3024.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <438F2831.7090309@apache.org> <4390AD43.4000405@eldiablo.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <0F0DDC35-D0ED-44AB-8029-706B0B29E98D@apache.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." Subject: Re: Full disclosure Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 06:55:23 -0500 To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Dec 2, 2005, at 3:23 PM, Elliott Draper wrote: > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > >> *snip* >> >> Sometimes, it's easier to rewrite some code than to convince >> people to relicense. >> >> *snip* > > > Perhaps this is one of those times? I don't wish to negate the > valiant efforts of those trying to resolve the licensing issues, > but I think that as an aside, maybe it'd be worthwhile to start a > class library project all of our own? We have one started :) The recent IBM and Intel contributions are exactly that. > In time, if the licensing issues with other projects were resolved, > then there would be nothing to stop us trying to integrate the best > of all worlds, and trying to combine all the available classlib > offerings to provide one open-source free implementation under the > Harmony banner. Yes - or give users choices. That's my hope for the modularity and interface work we've been discussing. > > I for one haven't had any exposure to the source code of any of the > classlib projects out there currently, I guess that would be a > factor in who would be able to contribute to a new classlib > codebase... The real question though is there any interest in this? > Is there anyone else on this list who like me is itching to write > and contribute some new code to the project, and who would be > interested in starting to implement the class libraries? :-) see enhanced/trunk/sandbox/contribs/ibm_core in SVN geir > > Thoughts, comments welcome. > > Cheers, > -= El =- > -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 geirm@apache.org