harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <stef...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Bootstrapping the classlibrary builds
Date Sat, 24 Dec 2005 07:26:07 GMT
Tim Ellison wrote:
> As a follow-up to the recent discussion with Geir about repository
> layout, I've been thinking a bit more about the componentization of the
> class library, and in particular about how day-to-day development would
> progress.
> 
> The 'interesting' attribute of the components is that there are circular
> dependencies between some of them.  For example, SECURITY depends upon
> LUNI, and vice versa.  I briefly discussed some options for resolving
> the circularities earlier, but the point is that this is a bootstrapping
> issue -- once we have implementations of SECURITY and LUNI then each can
> be built independently against the compiled version of the others.
> 
> So I propose that we make a clear distinction between the initial
> bootstrap build, and the subsequent component builds.  The build.xml
> that exists today (.../classlib/trunk/make/build.xml) invokes a 'global'
> i.e. cross-component compilation to avoid circularities.  The results
> are put into .../trunk/deploy/jre/lib/boot.
> 
> I say we keep this build.xml as the bootstrap build, then create build
> scripts within each component that build only that component against the
> jre/lib/boot jars thereby giving localized builds.  We can also write
> the component build scripts to use the deployed JRE to run ant and the
> compiler to be self-hosting!
> 
> Unless anyone objects or has a better idea I'll do the minor
> restructuring of classlib required (likely next week now).

Maybe I'm missing something, but if A depends on B and B depends on A, 
isn't the separation between A and B something to reconsider?

-- 
Stefano.


Mime
View raw message