Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83666 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2005 11:00:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 11:00:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 91645 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2005 11:00:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 91124 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2005 10:59:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 91113 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2005 10:59:58 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 02:59:58 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.160.152.237] (HELO gnu.wildebeest.org) (83.160.152.237) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 02:59:51 -0800 Received: from elsschot.wildebeest.org ([192.168.1.26]) by gnu.wildebeest.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EZnhK-0006pp-00 for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:00:58 +0100 Subject: Re: compiling bootJVM with MSVC From: Mark Wielaard To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: References: <20051104145701.31013.qmail@web30913.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1131187254.6411.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1131360036.8469.129.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-tbZ6IM3fMCCwPZueKKkR" Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:59:46 +0100 Message-Id: <1131533986.7570.145.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --=-tbZ6IM3fMCCwPZueKKkR Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Geir, On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 06:44 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > On Nov 7, 2005, at 5:40 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 08:44 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > >> Lets not count our chickens here. The LGPL policy is still in the > >> works, and may not allow anything but limited-time optional > >> dependencies, and no re-distrubution of LGPL-ed artifacts. > > > > But that is all we need for now don't we? >=20 > No, because we want to be able to distribute complete tested =20 > implementations of J2SE, right? :) It is a start don't you agree? And one that would help us forward now. In the end we want to combine all the projects to make up a complete free J2SE replacement. That will indeed take more work and cooperation. But this seems like a nice start. > > Of course we should lobby for more freedom. >=20 > I won't take that bait :0 I am not sure I am following you. If it is the word freedom, then replace it with flexibility. What we want if that the board allows us to combine and distribute the various projects. The above is a good first step since lots of people want to use and depend on LGPL-covered works. Over time we would like to have more compromises of course. Just like we compromised with GNU Classpath and added an exception statement to the GPLv2. If we could get something similar for the ASL to make it compatible with the GPL for the harmony code covered by the ASLv2 that would be ideal imho. > > But the main thing is to make sure there are no roadblocks for > > collaboration between the different free sofware projects. >=20 > Indeed! That's why I'm so certain that interoperability of modules =20 > and componentization will be so beneficial for us. Sure, but then we must be sure that we can combine these modules and components into a larger work in a way that makes both the GNU and Apache communities happy. > > If the board really refuses to allow us to distributed a fully > > integrated system containing all parts we can always put the whole > > collection up somewhere else. But we will cross that bridge when we =20 > > get there. Lets first put together the whole system. >=20 > Someone can always take the various works and post somewhere else, =20 > but we'll distribute what we test, and we won't be able to use Apache =20 > TCKs to test something we're not distributing from here. Then lets make sure we can all distribute it from here. But also think carefully whether we are a development group or a distributor. Most GNU/Linux distributions are much better at shipping stuff then we development communities. Cheers, Mark --=20 Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/ --=-tbZ6IM3fMCCwPZueKKkR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDcdaixVhZCJWr9QwRAqlfAJ9lrAn7bHF63yPcyxc3Y4hwd0hH/ACgkZeC J/rLn8u18kUXWS8SWyN295o= =Cesg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-tbZ6IM3fMCCwPZueKKkR--