harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: The Unofficial "Harmony, Licensing, the Universe and everything" FAQ
Date Fri, 18 Nov 2005 06:05:43 GMT
Anthony,

People who are willing to go the GPL route for their code have lots of
avenues as u know...

-- dims

On 11/18/05, Anthony Green <green@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 00:48 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > that's the prerogative of the contributor...
>
> No, I'm asking that the Harmony contribution process include a step
> asking the contributor to dual license their code (along with the
> reasoning).  And then the contributor can make an informed decision at
> an appropriate time.
>
> AG
>
>
> > -- dims
> >
> > On 11/18/05, Anthony Green <green@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 00:36 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > > > Anthony,
> > > >
> > > > Am sure you are aware that Apache does not get contributors to assign
> > > > copyrights to Apache when they contribute code.
> > >
> > > So why not simply have the Harmony contribution paperwork ask
> > > contributors to dual license their code under both the Apache and GNU
> > > Classpath licenses?
> > >
> > > AG
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>
>


--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/

Mime
View raw message